How Much Is a New York Dog Bite Case Worth?

After a serious dog attack, one of the first questions an injured person or family member may ask is, “How much is my dog bite case worth?” It is a reasonable question. A dog attack can result in emergency medical treatment, surgery, permanent scarring, nerve damage, missed time from work, emotional trauma, and months or even years of recovery. When those consequences affect your health, finances, appearance, employment, and everyday life, understanding what compensation may be available becomes extremely important.

There is no reliable “average” New York dog bite settlement that can tell you what your particular case is worth. The value of a claim depends on the individual facts, including the severity and permanence of the injuries, future medical treatment, liability evidence, available insurance coverage, witness credibility, and the documentation supporting the damages. Even two people with similar injuries can have very different cases because their medical prognoses, ages, occupations, insurance coverage, and liability evidence may be different.

At Greenstein & Pittari, LLP, we do not believe serious dog bite claims should be valued from a photograph, an online settlement calculator, or a brief conversation. Our attorneys investigate liability, insurance coverage, medical treatment, future medical needs, lost income, permanent injuries, emotional trauma, and the evidence necessary to demonstrate the full impact of an attack. If you or someone you love has been seriously injured by a dog anywhere in New York, call Greenstein & Pittari, LLP at 1-800-VICTIM2 (1-800-842-8462) for a free consultation. There are no upfront attorney’s fees, and you pay no attorney’s fee unless we recover compensation for you.

Is There an Average Dog Bite Settlement in New York?

There is no meaningful average settlement that can reliably predict what an individual New York dog bite case is worth. Published averages combine claims involving dramatically different injuries and circumstances. A relatively minor puncture wound treated with antibiotics cannot meaningfully be compared with an attack causing permanent facial disfigurement, nerve damage, loss of hand function, multiple surgeries, psychological trauma, or future reconstructive procedures.

Even cases involving apparently similar injuries may resolve differently. One victim may have clear evidence establishing liability and substantial insurance coverage, while another may face disputed liability or limited coverage. A visible scar may affect a young child differently from an adult, and an injury to the hand may have dramatically different economic consequences for a surgeon, construction worker, musician, or office employee. Medical prognosis and the likelihood of future treatment can also materially affect valuation.

Rather than asking what the “average” dog bite settlement is, the more useful question is what evidence determines the value of your particular claim. A meaningful evaluation requires examining the entire case rather than comparing it with a generalized statistic.

What Factors Determine How Much a New York Dog Bite Case Is Worth?

The value of a New York dog bite claim depends on the severity and permanence of the injuries, the medical treatment required, future medical needs, pain and suffering, emotional trauma, lost income, reduced earning capacity, the victim’s age, available insurance coverage, liability evidence, witness credibility, and whether multiple parties may share responsibility. No single factor determines the result.

Permanent injuries generally receive greater attention than conditions expected to resolve completely. A victim who requires emergency treatment followed by surgery, rehabilitation, scar revision, and future reconstructive care presents a different damages picture from someone whose wounds heal quickly without permanent consequences. The same principle applies to nerve or tendon injuries that interfere with the use of a hand, arm, leg, or another body part.

Evidence quality is also critical. Medical records, photographs, specialist evaluations, wage documentation, surveillance footage, witness testimony, animal-control records, prior complaints, and other evidence can affect how convincingly you can establish liability and damages. A substantial injury must still be properly documented and connected to a legally supportable claim.

Does Permanent Scarring Increase the Value of a Dog Bite Settlement?

Permanent scarring can significantly affect the value of a dog bite case, particularly when the scar is visible, disfiguring, or located on the face, neck, hands, arms, or legs. Dogs often injure exposed parts of the body, and a scar can create consequences long after the wound has healed.

When evaluating scar-related damages, relevant considerations can include the scar’s size, location, visibility, color, permanence, and whether future scar revision or plastic surgery has been recommended. A facial scar can affect self-confidence, social interactions, and other aspects of a person’s life. A scar on the hand or another functional area may also accompany underlying nerve, tendon, or tissue damage.

Proper valuation requires more than taking one photograph shortly after the attack. Scars change as wounds heal. Photographing the injury over time and obtaining appropriate medical or plastic-surgery evaluations can help establish whether the scar is permanent, whether additional procedures are recommended, and what improvement may realistically be expected.

How Are Facial Scars Valued in a New York Dog Bite Case?

No mathematical formula assigns a dollar amount to a facial scar. The evaluation generally considers the scar’s appearance, location, size, visibility, permanence, the victim’s age, recommendations for future treatment, and the disfigurement’s effect on the person’s life. The source material specifically identifies size, location, visibility, color, permanence, future scar revision, plastic-surgery recommendations, and age as important considerations.

A small scar in a relatively inconspicuous location may present a different damage analysis from a prominent scar across the cheek, forehead, lip, nose, or another highly visible facial area. Multiple scars can also create a different overall cosmetic effect than a single injury.

The psychological consequences matter as well. Permanent facial disfigurement can affect confidence, relationships, social interactions, and emotional well-being. Document those effects rather than assume them, especially when psychological treatment becomes necessary.

Why Can a Child’s Facial Scar Be Particularly Important?

Children’s dog bite cases often require careful long-term evaluation because a permanent scar can affect the child for many years. Facial scars may change as the child grows, and future reconstructive or scar-revision procedures may become necessary. The source material recognizes that children may require additional consideration for precisely these reasons.

The emotional consequences can also evolve. A young child may initially lack the ability to fully express embarrassment, anxiety, fear, or concerns about appearance. Those issues can become more apparent as the child grows older and becomes more socially aware.

For that reason, resolving a child’s serious dog bite claim too early can be particularly risky. Before valuing the case, you should understand the medical prognosis, future plastic-surgery recommendations, psychological effects, and long-term cosmetic consequences as thoroughly as possible.

Does Plastic Surgery Increase a Dog Bite Settlement?

Plastic surgery can materially affect the damages analysis because it may demonstrate both the seriousness of the injury and the need for additional medical care. Some victims require immediate plastic surgery after an attack, while others are evaluated later for scar revision, laser treatment, reconstructive procedures, or other interventions intended to improve permanent disfigurement.

A recommendation for future plastic surgery can be particularly important. The anticipated procedure may involve additional medical expenses, recovery time, pain, lost wages, and uncertainty about the ultimate cosmetic result. Future treatment therefore should not be viewed simply as another medical bill.

The medical evidence should explain what procedure is recommended, why it is necessary, when it may reasonably occur, and what outcome can be expected. This is one reason a meaningful settlement evaluation may not be possible immediately after the attack.

How Does Medical Treatment Affect the Value of a Dog Bite Claim?

The nature and extent of medical treatment can provide important evidence concerning the seriousness of a dog bite injury. Treatment may include emergency room care, hospitalization, plastic surgery, hand surgery, orthopedic surgery, skin grafting, scar revision, physical therapy, occupational therapy, psychological counseling, and future reconstructive procedures.

Treatment should not be viewed merely as a way to generate a larger claim. The objective is appropriate medical care. But when serious injuries genuinely require extensive treatment, the medical records can help demonstrate the physical consequences of the attack and the efforts required to recover.

The duration of treatment can also matter. A wound treated once and resolved may present a very different case from an injury requiring repeated specialist visits, surgery, rehabilitation, and long-term monitoring. Ultimately, the medical prognosis and permanent consequences generally matter more than simply counting appointments.

Why Do Future Medical Expenses Matter Before Settling?

A dog bite settlement should account for reasonably anticipated future medical needs, not merely expenses that have already been incurred. Serious attacks can require additional surgery, scar revision, laser treatment, physical therapy, occupational therapy, counseling, pain management, psychological care, or other treatment long after the initial wounds have healed.

This is one of the most important reasons to avoid settling prematurely. Once a personal injury settlement is finalized and an appropriate release is executed, the victim generally cannot return later simply because another procedure becomes necessary or a condition proves more serious than expected.

Future medical damages should therefore be supported by appropriate evidence. When specialists reasonably anticipate additional treatment, those recommendations can become an important part of evaluating the injury’s financial consequences.

Should I Settle Before I Know Whether I Need Future Surgery?

Generally, a serious dog bite claim should not be evaluated for final settlement without understanding the medical prognosis as fully as reasonably possible. If physicians are still determining whether scar revision, reconstructive surgery, nerve treatment, or another procedure is needed, key components of damages may remain uncertain.

An early settlement can appear attractive when medical bills are accumulating, and income has been lost. The problem is finality. The source material cautions that after settlement, a victim generally cannot return for additional compensation simply because another surgery becomes necessary, a scar becomes permanent, nerve damage worsens, or further treatment is required.

That does not mean every claim must remain open indefinitely. It means settlement timing should reflect the medical evidence, not an insurance company’s desire to resolve the case quickly.

Is Pain and Suffering a Major Part of a Dog Bite Settlement?

It can be. Medical expenses represent only part of the harm caused by a serious dog attack. Victims may experience physical pain, anxiety, fear of dogs, sleep disturbances, embarrassment, depression, post-traumatic stress symptoms, emotional distress, and loss of enjoyment of life. These non-economic consequences can represent a substantial component of a serious claim.

You cannot calculate pain and suffering by simply multiplying medical expenses by a predetermined number. The analysis is individualized. The nature and duration of the pain, permanency of the injury, limitations on daily activities, emotional consequences, treatment, and credibility of the evidence can all matter.

Documenting these losses is therefore important. Medical records, psychological treatment, testimony from the injured person, photographs, and evidence of changes in daily life can help explain consequences that medical bills alone cannot show.

Can Emotional Trauma Increase the Value of a Dog Bite Case?

Yes, emotional and psychological injuries may be compensable when supported by the evidence. Dog attacks can be terrifying events, and some victims continue experiencing anxiety, nightmares, fear of dogs, sleep problems, depression, embarrassment, or post-traumatic stress long after their physical wounds begin to heal.

The severity and duration of the psychological consequences matter. Temporary anxiety that quickly resolves presents a different situation from persistent symptoms requiring professional counseling or psychiatric treatment.

Children can be particularly vulnerable to emotional trauma after a violent animal attack. Parents may notice behavioral changes, sleep disturbances, avoidance, fear, or other problems. Appropriate professional evaluation can help address the child’s well-being while also documenting the nature and extent of those injuries.

Are Dog Bite Cases Involving Children Worth More?

Not automatically. A child’s age alone does not determine case value. However, dog bite cases involving children frequently require particularly careful evaluation because permanent facial scarring, future reconstructive treatment, emotional trauma, developmental concerns, school-related problems, and lifelong cosmetic consequences may be involved.

The long-term nature of the damages can be especially important. A young child with permanent disfigurement may live with the consequences for decades. Future scar revision or plastic surgery may not be appropriate until the child reaches a later stage of development.

Medical and psychological experts may therefore play an important role in determining future needs. The case should be evaluated based on the child’s actual injuries and prognosis, not on the assumption that every child claim is necessarily worth more.

Can a Dog Bite Settlement Include Lost Wages?

Yes. When a dog attack prevents someone from working, past lost wages may form part of the damages claim. More serious injuries may also affect future earnings or reduce the victim’s ability to perform the same occupation, potentially creating a claim involving future lost income or reduced earning capacity.

The economic consequences depend heavily on the injury and occupation. Damage to nerves or tendons in the hand can be particularly significant for someone whose work requires strength, dexterity, or fine motor control. Psychological injuries or visible scarring may affect other occupations differently.

Wage claims require documentation. Employment records, tax returns, pay information, disability notes, business records, and potentially expert analysis can become important, especially when the injured person is self-employed.

How Are Lost Earnings Proven for a Self-Employed Dog Bite Victim?

Self-employed victims can pursue legitimate economic losses, but documentation may be more complicated because there may be no employer-generated wage statement showing exactly what was lost. Tax returns, 1099 forms, invoices, contracts, bank records, business records, appointment calendars, and historical earnings can help establish pre-accident income and the injury’s financial impact.

The analysis should also account for the difference between gross business revenue and actual personal earnings. In substantial claims involving reduced future earning capacity, financial or vocational experts may sometimes be useful.

The source material notes that documenting losses for self-employed individuals may require additional financial records and expert analysis. A well-supported economic claim is generally more persuasive than an estimate unsupported by documentation.

Does Nerve Damage Increase the Value of a Dog Bite Case?

Nerve damage can significantly affect the seriousness of a claim when it causes permanent or long-lasting sensory or functional impairment. A dog bite can damage structures beneath the skin even when the visible wound eventually heals. Depending on the location and severity, nerve injury may cause numbness, weakness, pain, altered sensation, or functional limitations.

The effect on everyday life and employment can be substantial, particularly when the injury involves a hand or another body part essential to the victim’s occupation. Document treatment, prognosis, permanency, and functional limitations through appropriate medical evaluation.

The source material specifically identifies nerve damage as an important factor affecting case value. As with every injury, however, its impact depends on the actual medical evidence and consequences for the individual victim.

How Do Tendon and Hand Injuries Affect Compensation?

Tendon and hand injuries can substantially affect a dog bite claim when they interfere with strength, range of motion, grip, dexterity, or the ability to perform work and ordinary activities. The source material identifies tendon injuries and loss of hand function among the serious consequences that can distinguish one dog bite claim from another.

A visible hand wound may therefore represent only part of the injury. Surgery, occupational therapy, physical therapy, nerve evaluation, and long-term functional testing may be needed to understand the full extent of the damage.

The economic consequences can be particularly significant for people who depend on their hands professionally. A lasting limitation may affect not only pain and suffering but also future earning capacity.

How Does Infection Affect a Dog Bite Settlement?

Infection can increase the seriousness of a dog bite injury because animal bites can introduce bacteria into damaged tissue and may require additional medical treatment. The source material specifically identifies infection as a factor that can affect the value of a New York dog bite claim.

The effect on case value depends on the actual consequences. An infection that responds quickly to antibiotics is different from one requiring hospitalization, surgery, prolonged treatment, or causing additional tissue damage.

Medical records are critical because they establish the diagnosis, treatment, complications, and whether the infection produced any lasting consequences.

Does Insurance Coverage Affect How Much I Can Recover?

Insurance coverage can affect your ability to recover compensation, even when liability is strong and damages are substantial. Potential sources identified in the source material include homeowners insurance, renters insurance, landlord liability insurance, commercial liability insurance, property management coverage, and umbrella policies.

Insurance limits do not determine the actual severity or legal value of an injury. A permanent facial scar does not become less serious merely because the defendant carries limited insurance. Coverage does, however, affect the resources potentially available to satisfy a settlement or judgment.

For this reason, identifying all potentially applicable insurance is an important part of evaluating a serious claim. In some cases, multiple policies may require investigation before you can make meaningful settlement decisions.

Can Multiple Insurance Policies Increase the Available Recovery?

Potentially. When more than one legally responsible party or applicable layer of insurance exists, multiple policies may increase the financial resources available to satisfy a valid claim. The source material specifically recognizes that multiple policies can apply in some cases.

For example, a claim may involve primary liability coverage and potentially umbrella insurance, or separate coverage maintained by different responsible parties. Each policy must be investigated independently, and you should never assume additional insurance just because several parties are involved.

The purpose is not to recover twice for the same injury. It is to identify every legitimate source of compensation before the victim decides whether a proposed settlement adequately addresses the damages.

Does Liability Affect the Value of a Dog Bite Settlement?

Yes. Severe injuries alone do not automatically guarantee maximum compensation. The strength of the evidence establishing legal responsibility is an important part of evaluating any New York dog bite claim.

Relevant evidence may include surveillance video, doorbell-camera footage, witness testimony, Animal Control reports, Department of Health records, prior complaints involving the dog, photographs, and medical documentation. Strong evidence can help establish what occurred and support the legal theory of responsibility.

Conversely, significant factual disputes can affect settlement negotiations because insurers evaluate litigation risk. This is why preserving evidence immediately after an attack can matter even when the injuries themselves appear unquestionably serious.

What Evidence Can Increase the Strength of a Dog Bite Claim?

The strongest evidence depends on the circumstances, but video, independent witnesses, photographs, governmental or animal-control records, prior complaints, and medical documentation can all become important. The source material specifically identifies surveillance footage, Ring camera footage, witness testimony, Animal Control reports, Department of Health records, prior complaints, photographs, and medical records as potentially significant evidence.

Different evidence proves different parts of the case. Surveillance footage may establish how the attack occurred. Prior complaints may shed light on the dog’s history. Medical records establish injuries and treatment. Photographs can document wounds and scarring over time.

Effective case preparation requires assembling these pieces into a coherent factual presentation rather than relying on a single form of proof.

How Does Flanders v. Goodfellow Affect New York Dog Bite Claims?

The source material identifies the New York Court of Appeals decision in Flanders v. Goodfellow as an important development because it recognizes that negligence principles may apply in appropriate circumstances involving injuries caused by domestic animals. As a result, an investigation may need to examine not only the animal’s prior behavior but also the conduct of the owner or other potentially responsible parties.

This makes factual investigation particularly important. The circumstances surrounding how the animal was handled, controlled, or allowed to interact with others may matter depending on the legal theory and evidence.

The decision does not mean negligence automatically exists whenever a dog causes an injury. The facts still must support the applicable legal theory. But the source material correctly emphasizes the importance of investigating conduct and the dog’s behavioral history.

Does Comparative Fault Affect a New York Dog Bite Settlement?

Issues concerning the injured person’s conduct can potentially become part of the liability analysis, depending on the facts and legal theory asserted. An insurer may investigate what occurred immediately before the attack and argue that the victim’s conduct contributed to the incident.

Such an allegation does not automatically eliminate a claim. The surrounding circumstances must be evaluated carefully, including witness testimony, video evidence, the victim’s age, the dog’s behavior, and the conduct of the owner or other responsible parties.

This is another reason early evidence preservation matters. Objective video or independent witness testimony can be particularly important when the parties later disagree about what happened immediately before the attack.

How Do Insurance Companies Determine What to Offer in a Dog Bite Settlement?

Insurance companies evaluate numerous factors rather than simply adding together medical bills and making an offer. The source material identifies liability, medical records, future treatment, credibility, expert opinions, permanent disability, scarring, emotional trauma, available insurance, and litigation risk as important considerations.

An insurer may also consider the quality of the documentation and how effectively the case could be presented if litigation continues. Permanent injuries supported by specialist opinions and clear photographs may be evaluated differently from subjective complaints with limited supporting evidence.

This is why preparation can influence negotiations. A comprehensive demand supported by strong medical, liability, economic, and photographic evidence gives the insurer a more complete picture of the potential exposure if the case proceeds.

Is a Dog Bite Settlement Just a Multiple of the Medical Bills?

No. No universal formula multiplies medical expenses by a predetermined number to determine settlement value. Medical bills matter, but they represent only one component of damages.

A victim with relatively modest medical expenses may nevertheless have a permanent visible scar that creates substantial lifelong consequences. Another victim may have high medical expenses but ultimately make an excellent recovery without significant permanent limitations. Cases should not automatically be valued based on the amount billed for treatment.

A proper evaluation considers the complete impact of the attack, including permanency, future care, pain and suffering, emotional trauma, economic losses, liability, evidence, and available insurance.

Should I Accept the Insurance Company’s First Dog Bite Settlement Offer?

Not before you understand the full extent of your injuries, long-term prognosis, future treatment needs, and available insurance coverage. An early offer can be tempting when medical expenses are accumulating, or the victim has been unable to work, but resolving the case before the damages are fully understood can create significant risk.

Permanent scarring may not be apparent immediately. Nerve damage can evolve. Plastic surgeons may recommend future procedures only after the wound matures. Psychological symptoms can persist long after the initial attack. Each of these developments can materially affect a fair evaluation.

Once a settlement is finalized, the victim generally cannot return to demand more compensation simply because the injury ultimately proves worse than expected. Settlement timing should therefore be based on informed medical and legal judgment, not immediate financial pressure.

Why Do Insurance Companies Make Early Settlement Offers?

An insurer may seek early resolution before the claim develops further. At that stage, future medical needs, permanent scarring, long-term psychological effects, or additional treatment may still be uncertain.

An early offer is not automatically unfair. In some cases, prompt resolution may be appropriate. The critical question is whether enough information exists to determine whether the proposed amount reasonably reflects the full damages.

Before accepting an offer, the victim should understand what rights they will release and whether the medical prognosis is sufficiently developed to make a final decision.

What Happens if I Settle and Later Need Another Surgery?

Once a settlement is finalized and the claim is released, the injured person generally cannot return later simply because additional treatment or surgery becomes necessary. The source material specifically warns about settling before understanding whether another surgery, permanent scarring, worsening nerve damage, or additional treatment may occur.

That finality makes future medical evaluation extremely important. If a physician reasonably anticipates additional procedures, the claim should be valued to reflect those needs.

A settlement should resolve the case based on an informed understanding of the injuries, not an incomplete snapshot taken shortly after the attack.

Can a Lawyer Tell Me Exactly What My Dog Bite Case Is Worth During the First Consultation?

A lawyer may be able to provide an initial assessment, but a reliable valuation generally requires much more information. The source material expressly cautions against promises of a specific dollar amount before the case has been thoroughly investigated.

Medical records must be reviewed. Liability must be investigated. Insurance coverage must be identified. The permanence of scars and other injuries must be evaluated. Please understand the future treatment and economic losses.

An attorney who immediately promises a specific result without that information may be overlooking important facts that could increase or decrease the value of the claim. Careful evaluation is generally more useful than an attractive but unsupported number.

Are Online Dog Bite Settlement Calculators Accurate?

An online calculator cannot meaningfully evaluate the individual factors that determine the value of a serious dog bite claim. It cannot examine a scar, assess witness credibility, interpret a surgeon’s prognosis, investigate prior complaints, determine available insurance, evaluate lost earning capacity, or assess how compelling the evidence may be at trial.

The same problem applies to generalized settlement averages. Dog bite claims range from relatively minor wounds to catastrophic injuries involving permanent disfigurement and loss of function.

A meaningful valuation therefore requires individualized legal and medical analysis, not a formula based on a few numbers entered into a website.

Can a Dog Bite Case Be Worth More if It Goes to Trial?

A trial can potentially result in a verdict greater than a settlement offer, but it can also result in less compensation or no recovery at all. Litigation involves uncertainty. That risk is one factor both sides consider during settlement negotiations.

The strength of liability evidence, medical proof, witness credibility, expert testimony, permanent injuries, and the ability to clearly present the damages can all influence litigation strategy.

The objective should not be to go to trial simply because a larger result is theoretically possible. The objective is to prepare the case strongly enough that the client can make an informed decision between settlement and continued litigation.

What Is the Difference Between a Dog Bite Settlement and Verdict?

A settlement is an agreement that resolves the claim without a final trial verdict. A verdict is a decision reached after the case is tried and the factfinder determines liability and damages.

Settlement provides greater certainty because the parties know the amount and terms before the case concludes. Trial carries greater uncertainty but may become necessary when the parties cannot agree on liability or fair compensation.

Strong preparation matters in either situation. Developing a case as though it may ultimately be tried can often put the injured person in a stronger position during negotiations.

How Does Greenstein & Pittari, LLP Evaluate a Dog Bite Case?

At Greenstein & Pittari, LLP, a meaningful dog bite case evaluation considers far more than photographs or the amount of the medical bills. The source material identifies liability, insurance coverage, medical treatment, future medical needs, plastic-surgery recommendations, expert opinions, lost income, permanent disability, emotional trauma, and the likelihood of success at trial as important parts of the firm’s evaluation.

Those factors must be considered together. A permanent scar may require plastic-surgery analysis. A hand injury may require evaluation of future earning capacity. A substantial claim may require investigation of multiple insurance policies. Disputed liability may require witnesses, surveillance footage, prior complaints, and other independent evidence.

Only after the relevant facts have been developed can the client receive a meaningful assessment of settlement strategy. The objective is not to provide the fastest number. It is to develop the strongest supportable valuation of the claim.

How Can I Help Maximize the Value of My New York Dog Bite Claim?

The most important step is to protect your health and create an accurate record of the attack’s consequences. Get appropriate medical treatment and follow it. Photograph injuries and scars throughout the healing process. Complete recommended specialist evaluations and report symptoms accurately to healthcare providers.

Also preserve evidence concerning liability promptly. Witness information, surveillance footage, doorbell-camera recordings, incident reports, photographs, and records concerning the dog may become difficult to obtain over time. Likewise, document wage losses and out-of-pocket expenses rather than reconstructing them months later.

Maximizing a claim does not mean exaggerating injuries or undergoing unnecessary treatment. It means thoroughly documenting the genuine physical, emotional, and financial consequences of the attack while preserving the evidence necessary to establish legal responsibility.

Why Choose Greenstein & Pittari, LLP?

A serious New York dog bite claim deserves more than a quick estimate based on medical bills or a photograph of a wound. Permanent scarring, nerve damage, future plastic surgery, psychological trauma, lost earning capacity, insurance coverage, disputed liability, and the quality of the available evidence can all affect the ultimate value of the case. An effective evaluation requires understanding not only what happened during the attack but how the injuries may affect the victim for years to come.

For decades, Greenstein & Pittari, LLP has represented injury victims throughout New York. Our attorneys have extensive experience litigating complex personal injury cases and pursuing claims against individuals, property owners, businesses, institutions, and, when applicable, governmental entities. We conduct thorough investigations, preserve critical evidence, identify available insurance coverage, analyze future medical needs and economic losses, document the full extent of damages, and prepare cases for aggressive litigation when a fair settlement cannot be reached.

We also believe effective representation requires compassion and personalized attention. A dog attack can affect far more than physical health. Victims may be dealing with visible scars, fear, embarrassment, financial pressure, uncertainty about future surgery, and concern about whether they will ever fully recover. Our English- and Spanish-speaking staff helps clients and families understand the legal process and the decisions that can affect their financial future.

If you or someone you love has been seriously injured in a dog attack anywhere in New York, contact Greenstein & Pittari, LLP promptly. We offer free consultations and handle personal injury cases on a contingency fee basis. No upfront attorney’s fees, and you pay no attorney’s fee unless we recover compensation for you.

Don’t Be a Victim Twice.

Call Greenstein & Pittari, LLP at 1-800-VICTIM2 (1-800-842-8462) today for a free consultation. Let us investigate the liability, insurance coverage, medical evidence, future damages, and every other factor necessary to determine the full value of your New York dog bite claim.