Who Pays When an E-Bike Rider Hits a Pedestrian in NYC?
Electric bicycles have transformed transportation and delivery services throughout New York City, but their growing presence has also created serious dangers for pedestrians. A person walking across an intersection, entering a crosswalk, stepping out of a building, or simply using a sidewalk may have little warning before an e-bike strikes them. Unlike traditional bicycles, many e-bikes can accelerate quickly and reach speeds that can cause devastating injuries. When an e-bike collides with a pedestrian, the consequences may include traumatic brain injuries, broken bones, spinal damage, permanent disability, and, in the most tragic circumstances, wrongful death.
For injured pedestrians, one of the most difficult questions is who will pay for their medical treatment, lost income, and pain and suffering. Although New York law lets injured pedestrians seek compensation from negligent e-bike riders, these claims are often more complicated than ordinary automobile accident cases. Electric bicycles generally are not required to carry the same liability insurance as registered motor vehicles, and New York’s automobile No-Fault insurance system does not automatically cover every pedestrian injured by an e-bike. Additional complications arise when the rider works for a delivery company, leaves the accident scene, operates an improperly classified vehicle, or has no insurance or assets available to satisfy a judgment.
At Greenstein & Pittari, LLP, our New York City personal injury attorneys investigate pedestrian accidents involving electric bicycles, delivery riders, commercial operators, and other micromobility devices. We examine how the collision occurred, determine whether the rider violated applicable traffic laws, investigate potential employer or company liability, and identify every available source of insurance and compensation. If you or a loved one was struck by an electric bicycle in Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, the Bronx, or Staten Island, contact Greenstein & Pittari, LLP at 1-800-VICTIM2 (1-800-842-8462) for a free consultation. Don’t Be a Victim Twice.
Can a Pedestrian Sue an E-Bike Rider After Being Hit in New York City?
Yes, a pedestrian injured by a negligent e-bike rider may file a personal injury lawsuit to recover compensation for injuries and financial losses caused by the collision. Under New York negligence law, an injured pedestrian generally must show the rider owed a duty to exercise reasonable care, breached that duty, and caused injuries that resulted in compensable damages. An e-bike rider who disregards a traffic signal, fails to yield to a pedestrian, rides unlawfully on a sidewalk, or operates at an unsafe speed may be found negligent when that conduct contributes to an accident. The fact that an electric bicycle is smaller than a car does not relieve its operator of the obligation to use reasonable care around pedestrians. A successful lawsuit may provide compensation for medical expenses, lost earnings, pain and suffering, permanent disability, and other recoverable losses. However, proving that the rider was negligent is only one part of the case. The injured pedestrian must also establish the nature and extent of the injuries and determine whether the defendant has insurance or sufficient assets to satisfy a judgment.
Who Is Legally Responsible When an E-Bike Hits a Pedestrian?
The electric bicycle operator is often the primary potentially responsible party when negligent riding causes a pedestrian collision, but other individuals or businesses may also share legal responsibility. Liability depends on who controlled the bicycle, why the rider was operating it, whether the rider was performing work duties, and whether another party’s conduct contributed to the accident. For example, a delivery worker who strikes a pedestrian while completing an order may be personally responsible for negligent operation. At the same time, an employer may face additional liability if the worker was acting within the scope of employment. A company that negligently maintained a rental e-bike or supplied defective equipment may also be liable if the equipment failure contributed to the collision. These claims require more than identifying the person who physically struck the pedestrian. Attorneys must investigate the rider’s employment relationship, the bicycle’s ownership and maintenance, any relevant commercial agreements, and available insurance policies to determine which defendants may be legally responsible.
Do E-Bike Riders Have to Yield to Pedestrians in NYC?
Yes, electric bicycle riders must follow applicable traffic laws governing pedestrian right-of-way and use reasonable care to avoid collisions. New York Vehicle and Traffic Law provisions governing bicycles and electric-assist bicycles impose traffic-related obligations on riders, while additional rules regulate their operation in New York City. A pedestrian lawfully crossing with a walk signal generally has important right-of-way protections, and an e-bike rider cannot disregard those protections merely because the rider is traveling in a bicycle lane or making a delivery. Even when a pedestrian does not have the right-of-way, the rider must still respond reasonably to visible hazards and avoid conduct that unnecessarily endangers others. An accident investigation should examine the traffic signals, intersection layout, pedestrian movements, rider speed, visibility, and opportunities to avoid the collision. A traffic violation can be strong evidence of negligence, but you still must establish the link between the violation and the accident’s actual cause.
Is It Illegal to Ride an Electric Bicycle on a New York City Sidewalk?
Electric bicycles generally cannot be operated on New York City sidewalks unless a specific legal exception authorizes that use. Sidewalk restrictions protect pedestrians who reasonably expect to walk without encountering motor-assisted bicycles in crowded pedestrian areas. When an e-bike rider strikes someone while riding unlawfully on a sidewalk, that violation may provide important evidence supporting a negligence claim, particularly when the collision occurred because the rider was traveling through an area reserved for pedestrians. However, a sidewalk violation does not automatically establish every element of civil liability. The injured person must still connect the unlawful conduct to the collision and prove the resulting injuries and damages. Surveillance footage, witness testimony, photographs of the location, and evidence of the rider’s path can help determine whether the rider used the sidewalk improperly and whether the pedestrian had a reasonable opportunity to see the approaching bicycle.
What Is the Speed Limit for Electric Bicycles in New York City?
New York City currently imposes a 15 mph speed limit on e-bike and e-scooter riders, according to the NYC Department of Transportation. This citywide operating limit differs from the technical speed capabilities used to classify electric bicycles under New York Vehicle and Traffic Law § 102-c. For example, a Class 3 electric bicycle may have a statutory motor-assistance classification allowing a higher design speed. Still, that classification does not authorize the rider to disregard New York City’s lower operating limit. When an e-bike strikes a pedestrian, excessive speed can become a central liability issue because it affects the rider’s stopping distance, reaction time, and ability to avoid a foreseeable collision. Investigators may review surveillance footage, witness statements, electronic data, the distance traveled before impact, and the collision’s severity. Even a rider traveling below the posted limit may be negligent if the speed was unreasonable for a crowded sidewalk, intersection, or other dangerous condition.
Can a Pedestrian Sue an E-Bike Rider Who Runs a Red Light?
Yes, a pedestrian injured by an electric bicycle rider who runs a red light may pursue a negligence claim when the traffic violation contributed to causing the collision. Electric bicycle riders must follow applicable traffic-control requirements, and a rider who disregards a red signal can create a serious hazard for pedestrians crossing an intersection. Establishing liability requires examining which signal controlled the rider, whether the pedestrian was lawfully crossing, the timing of the signals, and whether the rider had sufficient time and distance to stop. Defense attorneys may argue that the pedestrian entered the roadway unexpectedly, crossed against the signal, or failed to observe approaching traffic. Those allegations do not automatically excuse a rider’s violation or establish that the pedestrian caused the accident. Video recordings, traffic signal information, witness testimony, and physical evidence can help reconstruct the sequence of events and determine whether the rider’s unlawful conduct was a substantial factor in causing the injuries.
Can a Pedestrian Recover Compensation If the E-Bike Rider Was Working for a Delivery Company?
Yes, a pedestrian struck by an e-bike delivery worker may have a claim against the rider and potentially against an employer or another legally responsible business. Under the doctrine of respondeat superior, an employer may be vicariously liable for an employee’s negligence when the employee acts within the scope of employment. However, determining whether a delivery worker is an employee or an independent contractor requires examining the actual working relationship rather than accepting the company’s contractual description at face value. Relevant evidence may include the company’s control over the worker’s activities, scheduling, equipment, delivery procedures, and other circumstances surrounding the work. A delivery platform is not automatically liable just because the rider transported an order arranged through its app. Nevertheless, a thorough investigation may reveal an employment relationship, independent negligence, or another legal basis for pursuing a company. Identifying a financially responsible business and applicable commercial insurance can be especially important when the individual rider has limited resources.
Can You Sue Uber Eats, DoorDash, Grubhub, or Another Delivery Platform After an E-Bike Accident?
A pedestrian may pursue a claim against a delivery platform when the facts and applicable law establish a legally recognized basis for holding the company responsible. Still, the platform is not automatically liable for every accident involving a worker using its application. Companies such as Uber Eats, DoorDash, and Grubhub frequently operate through contractual relationships that raise disputes about employment status, operational control, and insurance coverage. A plaintiff may need to investigate whether the rider was acting as an employee, whether the company exercised legally significant control over the work, or whether the company’s own negligent conduct contributed to the accident. App records may establish whether the rider was accepting an order, traveling to a restaurant, transporting a delivery, or completing a transaction when the collision occurred. Those records can be relevant to the scope of work, the identity of the contracting entity, and the existence of potentially applicable insurance. The strongest cases rely on evidence of the actual relationship and conduct, not simply the delivery company’s name appearing on a food bag or mobile application.
What Happens If the E-Bike Rider Has No Insurance?
A pedestrian injured by an uninsured e-bike rider may still have a valid negligence claim, but recovering compensation can be more difficult when the responsible individual lacks liability insurance or substantial assets. Unlike registered automobiles, qualifying electric bicycles generally are not subject to the same mandatory automobile liability insurance requirements. Consequently, an injured pedestrian should not assume a standard automobile insurance policy will pay the claim. Depending on the circumstances and policy terms, alternative sources may include homeowners or renters insurance, commercial liability coverage, employer insurance, or coverage tied to a rental or delivery operation. These policies may exclude motorized devices, business activities, or accidents based on the location and nature of the accident. Having a policy does not necessarily mean it covers the accident. Therefore, a careful insurance investigation is essential before concluding that the only available defendant is an uninsured individual.
Does New York No-Fault Insurance Cover a Pedestrian Hit by an E-Bike?
New York automobile No-Fault insurance generally does not cover a pedestrian struck solely by a legally qualifying electric bicycle. Under Vehicle and Traffic Law § 125, bicycles with electric assist meeting the statutory definition are excluded from the general definition of motor vehicles. New York’s No-Fault system principally addresses qualifying injuries arising from the use or operation of covered motor vehicles, so a collision involving only a pedestrian and a qualifying e-bike ordinarily does not create a standard automobile No-Fault claim. The analysis can change if a covered automobile was also involved or if the device was actually a moped, motorcycle, or another legally distinct motor vehicle. For example, a motorized two-wheeler advertised as an e-bike may not satisfy the statutory definition if its equipment or operating capabilities place it in another category. Proper classification is therefore essential before deciding whether No-Fault benefits, bodily injury liability coverage, or another insurance system applies.
Does a Pedestrian Have to Prove a Serious Injury to Sue an E-Bike Rider?
A pedestrian injured solely by a qualifying electric bicycle generally does not have to satisfy New York Insurance Law § 5102(d)’s serious-injury threshold to pursue ordinary negligence damages against the rider. That threshold applies in the circumstances governed by Insurance Law Article 51 and should not automatically apply to accidents involving vehicles excluded from the relevant motor vehicle classification. This distinction can be particularly important for pedestrians who suffer painful injuries that interfere with daily life but do not satisfy one of the statutory serious-injury categories. For example, a pedestrian may sustain significant bruising, soft tissue injuries, or other harm that produces compensable damages without necessarily meeting the threshold applicable to certain automobile accident lawsuits. The plaintiff must still establish negligence, causation, and the extent of the claimed injuries. If the collision involved a registered motor vehicle or a device legally classified differently from an e-bike, Article 51 may apply, but it requires separate analysis.
Can a Pedestrian Recover Compensation If They Were Partly at Fault?
Yes, a pedestrian who contributed to an accident involving a qualifying electric bicycle may still recover compensation under New York’s comparative-fault rules. However, the amount may be reduced according to the pedestrian’s share of responsibility. Under CPLR § 1411(a), contributory negligence generally does not bar recovery in personal injury actions outside the special framework addressed by subsection (b). Instead, the court reduces recoverable damages in proportion to the claimant’s culpable conduct. For example, if a pedestrian’s total proven damages are $100,000 and the pedestrian is found 20% responsible for an accident governed by the general comparative-fault rule, the damages would ordinarily be reduced to $80,000. This analysis requires more than showing that the pedestrian was distracted, crossed outside a marked crosswalk, or failed to observe the bicycle. The alleged conduct must have contributed to causing the collision. When the action is subject to Insurance Law Article 51, you must consider the separate comparative-fault provisions of CPLR § 1411(b), so the classification of the vehicles involved remains significant.
Can a Pedestrian Sue After Being Struck by an E-Bike in a Crosswalk?
Yes, a pedestrian struck by a negligent e-bike rider in a crosswalk may seek compensation for collision-related injuries. Crosswalk accidents frequently involve disputes over traffic signals, turning movements, visibility, and whether the rider yielded when required. A pedestrian crossing with the right-of-way has significant legal protections, but a marked crosswalk does not eliminate the need to examine the surrounding circumstances. An e-bike rider may claim that the pedestrian entered suddenly, was distracted by a telephone, or moved unpredictably. The pedestrian’s attorney should investigate whether the rider was traveling too fast, failed to observe the crossing, disregarded a signal, or had an opportunity to avoid the collision. Traffic camera footage, nearby business surveillance, witness statements, and intersection photographs can help establish what happened. Because crosswalk collisions often happen within seconds, objective evidence may matter most when the rider and pedestrian give conflicting accounts.
Can You Sue If an E-Bike Rider Hits You While Entering or Leaving a Building?
Yes, a pedestrian injured by an e-bike rider while entering or leaving a building may have a negligence claim when the rider failed to exercise reasonable care. These accidents often occur near apartment entrances, storefronts, restaurants, office buildings, and busy commercial sidewalks where pedestrians may have limited visibility of approaching bicycles. A rider traveling unlawfully on a sidewalk or operating too quickly near a building entrance may create a foreseeable risk of injury. Liability may also involve another party if a dangerous property condition contributed to the collision. However, a property owner is not automatically responsible merely because the accident occurred outside the building. The investigation should consider the rider’s speed and direction, whether the bicycle was being ridden or walked, the entrance’s physical layout, and whether obstructions prevented either person from seeing the other. Building surveillance footage can be particularly valuable because it may show the collision and the rider’s conduct immediately beforehand.
What If the E-Bike Rider Leaves the Scene Without Identifying Themselves?
A pedestrian injured by an unidentified e-bike rider may still pursue legal remedies, but identifying a responsible defendant and locating available insurance can become substantially more difficult. Unlike an ordinary hit-and-run involving a covered automobile, a collision involving only a qualifying electric bicycle generally does not automatically trigger uninsured motorist benefits or MVAIC protection. Those programs are designed for qualifying motor vehicle accidents and have specific eligibility requirements. Nevertheless, a police investigation, surveillance recordings, delivery records, witness statements, and nearby business cameras may help identify the rider. If the rider was performing a commercial delivery, restaurant records or platform information may provide additional investigative leads. An unidentified rider may also have used a rental bicycle, which may appear in transaction records. Prompt investigation is critical because video may be overwritten, witnesses may become difficult to locate, and electronic records may not remain available indefinitely.
Can a Pedestrian Sue a Rental E-Bike Company After an Accident?
A pedestrian may sue a rental e-bike company when the company’s negligence, or another legally recognized basis of liability, contributed to the collision. Still, ownership of the bicycle alone does not necessarily establish responsibility for the rider’s conduct. For example, a rental operator may face a claim if it supplied a bicycle with defective brakes, failed to address a known dangerous mechanical condition, or negligently maintained equipment that contributed to the accident. The company may dispute responsibility when the collision resulted solely from a customer’s careless riding. Relevant evidence includes rental agreements, maintenance and inspection records, prior defect complaints, electronic trip information, and records identifying the person who rented the bicycle. The legal analysis should distinguish negligence in maintaining or supplying the equipment from vicarious liability for the rider’s conduct. A thorough investigation may reveal that the company bears independent responsibility even when it did not directly control the rider’s movements at the time of the collision.
What If an E-Bike Rider Hits a Child or Elderly Pedestrian?
Children and older adults injured by negligent e-bike riders may pursue personal injury claims, and their age or physical vulnerability can significantly affect the medical consequences and damages. A collision that causes relatively minor injuries to a healthy adult may result in a serious fracture, traumatic brain injury, or permanent loss of independence for an elderly pedestrian. Children may suffer injuries that affect growth, education, development, or future physical functioning. The negligence analysis still examines whether the rider failed to exercise reasonable care, but the injured person’s particular vulnerabilities may matter when evaluating the harm caused by the collision. Claims involving children can also involve special procedural protections, court approval of settlements, and rules concerning the appointment of a representative. In cases involving elderly victims, medical evidence may be necessary to distinguish preexisting conditions from injuries caused or aggravated by the accident. Neither age nor a preexisting medical condition automatically eliminates the right to recover damages caused by another person’s negligence.
What Injuries Commonly Occur When an Electric Bicycle Strikes a Pedestrian?
Pedestrians struck by electric bicycles can suffer serious orthopedic, neurological, spinal, and internal injuries, even when the collision occurs at a relatively low speed. A pedestrian may be knocked backward onto pavement, thrown into a parked vehicle, or struck directly by the bicycle’s frame or handlebars. These mechanisms can cause wrist and shoulder fractures, hip fractures, traumatic brain injuries, concussions, facial injuries, spinal disc injuries, ligament damage, and significant soft tissue trauma. Some victims require surgery, rehabilitation, or long-term assistance with ordinary activities. Head injuries can be particularly concerning because symptoms involving memory, concentration, balance, or personality may develop or become more apparent after the initial emergency treatment. The medical consequences also depend on the victim’s age, physical condition, and how the impact occurred. A personal injury claim should document not only the initial diagnosis but also continuing pain, functional restrictions, treatment needs, and the effect of the injuries on employment and daily life.
How Much Compensation Can a Pedestrian Recover After an E-Bike Accident?
Compensation after an e-bike pedestrian accident depends on injury severity, the strength of the liability evidence, the resulting financial losses, and the ability to recover payment from responsible parties. Recoverable damages may include past and future medical expenses, lost earnings, diminished earning capacity, pain and suffering, emotional distress associated with the physical injuries, and the cost of necessary assistance or future care. A pedestrian who suffers a fracture requiring surgery and prolonged rehabilitation may have substantially different damages from someone who experiences temporary injuries without lasting limitations. Permanent disability, disfigurement, and the loss of independence may also significantly affect case valuation. However, legally recoverable damages should not be confused with what an insurer or defendant can financially pay. When the rider is uninsured, identifying an employer, rental operator, or other responsible party may be essential to obtaining a meaningful recovery. No attorney can responsibly determine a case’s value without reviewing the facts, medical evidence, applicable law, and available coverage.
Can a Pedestrian Recover Damages for an E-Bike Accident That Aggravated a Preexisting Condition?
Yes, a pedestrian may recover damages when a negligent e-bike collision aggravates or worsens a preexisting medical condition, provided the evidence establishes that the accident caused the additional injury or impairment. Insurance companies and defense attorneys may point to degenerative spinal changes, prior orthopedic treatment, arthritis, or other medical conditions and argue that the pedestrian’s complaints existed before the accident. However, a preexisting condition does not necessarily mean the collision caused no compensable harm. A person with previously manageable arthritis, for example, may suffer a traumatic injury that produces substantial new pain, requires surgery, or significantly reduces mobility. Medical records documenting the victim’s condition before and after the accident can help distinguish longstanding symptoms from new injuries or aggravation. Treating physicians may also provide opinions concerning causation and changes in functional ability. The plaintiff must establish injuries attributable to the collision rather than rely solely on the fact that symptoms appeared afterward.
What Evidence Is Most Important in a Pedestrian E-Bike Accident Lawsuit?
The most important evidence often establishes the rider’s identity, how the collision occurred, and whether another individual or business shares legal responsibility. Surveillance video from stores, residential buildings, restaurants, and traffic-facing cameras may show the rider’s speed, direction, signal compliance, and conduct immediately before impact. Witness testimony can help establish whether the pedestrian had the right-of-way or whether the rider was operating on a sidewalk. Police reports may identify the parties and record statements, but you must evaluate the report’s contents and admissibility separately. If the rider was working, delivery app records, order information, employment documents, and insurance policies may reveal additional defendants or coverage. Medical records, diagnostic imaging, employment documentation, and treating physicians’ opinions establish the nature and financial consequences of the injuries. Because surveillance footage can be erased quickly, an attorney may need to send preservation demands and take other appropriate steps before potentially decisive evidence disappears.
Can You File a Wrongful Death Lawsuit If an E-Bike Accident Kills a Pedestrian?
Yes, when a pedestrian dies because of an e-bike rider’s negligence, the decedent’s legally appointed personal representative may bring a wrongful death action under New York Estates, Powers and Trusts Law § 5-4.1. These cases require proof that the defendant’s wrongful conduct caused the death and that the statutory requirements for recovery are satisfied. Depending on the facts, recoverable damages may include qualifying financial losses suffered by the decedent’s distributees, funeral expenses, and other damages permitted by New York law. A separate survival claim may also be available for injuries and conscious pain and suffering experienced before death. The legal analysis must distinguish wrongful death damages from damages belonging to the decedent’s estate, because they serve different purposes. Wrongful death actions generally must be commenced within two years of death, subject to applicable statutory provisions and exceptions. Families should seek prompt legal guidance, particularly when the responsible rider is unidentified, or the investigation may involve a commercial delivery company or another potentially responsible entity.
How Long Do You Have to Sue After Being Hit by an E-Bike in New York?
Most New York negligence lawsuits must be commenced within three years of the accident under CPLR § 214(5), though important exceptions and shorter deadlines may apply. If an accident involves a municipal defendant, General Municipal Law § 50-e may require a Notice of Claim within 90 days, and General Municipal Law § 50-i generally imposes a one-year-and-90-day commencement period for covered claims. Other governmental entities and special defendants may be subject to different procedural rules. Claims involving minors, wrongful death, or other exceptional circumstances require separate limitations analysis. An injured pedestrian should not assume that the ordinary three-year period applies to every potentially responsible party. Waiting can also jeopardize the case long before the legal deadline expires because surveillance recordings may be deleted, witnesses may become unavailable, and records identifying the rider may be lost. Early investigation helps preserve evidence and allows counsel to identify applicable deadlines before they become obstacles to recovery.
What Should You Do Immediately After Being Hit by an E-Bike?
A pedestrian struck by an electric bicycle should seek appropriate medical attention, report the collision, and, when safe, preserve information that identifies the rider and any witnesses. Injuries such as concussions, internal trauma, fractures, and spinal damage may not be fully apparent immediately after impact, making prompt medical evaluation especially important. If possible, the pedestrian should photograph the bicycle, the rider, the surrounding intersection or sidewalk, and any visible injuries. Identifying a delivery bag, rental company marking, or other distinctive feature may help investigators locate a rider who later becomes difficult to identify. Identify nearby businesses and buildings because their surveillance systems may have recordings of the collision. The injured person should also preserve medical bills, treatment records, employment information, and communications with any insurance company. Before accepting a settlement or signing a release, it is prudent to understand the full extent of the injuries and whether other potentially responsible parties or insurance policies exist.
Why Choose Greenstein & Pittari, LLP?
Pedestrian accidents involving electric bicycles present legal challenges that differ from traditional automobile collisions. An injured pedestrian may face substantial medical expenses and permanent physical limitations only to discover the responsible rider has no automobile liability insurance. Identifying the rider, investigating commercial delivery relationships, preserving surveillance footage, and locating available insurance coverage can be critical to obtaining meaningful compensation. At Greenstein & Pittari, LLP, our attorneys bring decades of experience representing injured New Yorkers and litigating complex personal injury cases involving disputed negligence, multiple defendants, and serious injuries.
Our firm investigates pedestrian e-bike collisions, focusing on the evidence that determines responsibility. We examine traffic signals, sidewalk restrictions, rider conduct, surveillance recordings, delivery records, employment relationships, and applicable insurance policies. When the circumstances support claims against a commercial business, rental operator, property owner, or governmental entity, we investigate those potential sources of liability rather than limiting the case to the person who physically caused the collision. Our experience handling complex personal injury litigation allows us to anticipate defenses involving comparative fault, disputed causation, preexisting medical conditions, and disagreements over the extent of a victim’s injuries.
We also understand the personal consequences of a serious pedestrian accident. Injured individuals may be unable to work, care for family members, or perform activities they previously enjoyed. Older pedestrians may lose independence, while families of severely injured children may face years of treatment and uncertainty. Greenstein & Pittari, LLP combines thorough investigations and aggressive litigation with compassionate representation and personalized attention. We serve accident victims throughout Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, the Bronx, Staten Island, Long Island, and Westchester County, with English- and Spanish-speaking staff available to assist clients and their families.
Greenstein & Pittari, LLP offers free consultations and contingency fee representation—our Fee Guarantee: No Fee Unless Successful. If you or a loved one has been struck by an electric bicycle, do not assume that the rider’s lack of insurance or the complexity of the accident means you have no legal options. Contact our New York City pedestrian accident attorneys at 1-800-VICTIM2 (1-800-842-8462) to discuss your injuries, identify potentially responsible parties, and learn what compensation may be available under New York law.
Don’t Be a Victim Twice.